Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 181 P3D 831 - State v. Hicks

State v. Hicks’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently August 2023

1 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

120200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Miller-El v. Cockrell Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division · Batson v. Kentucky · Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[6] Id. at 98 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 . ¶ 48 Trial courts are not required to find a prima facie case based on the dismissal of the only venire person from a constitutionally cognizable group, but they may, in their discretion, recognize a prima facie case in such instances. State v. Hicks, 163 Wash.2d 477, 490 , 181 P.3d 831 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. 278 , 172 L.Ed.2d 205 (2008). The Batson Court noted that”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In reviewing a trial court's ruling on a Batson challenge, [t]he determination of the trial judge is accorded great deference on appeal, and will be upheld unless clearly erroneous.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`[a] single invidiously discriminatory governmental act' is not `immunized by the absence of such discrimination in the making of other comparable decisions.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.