Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

181 So. 2d 19

Porterfield v. Porterfield

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 7, 1965

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1965-12-07

Relies on Porterfield v. Porterfield

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1965-12-07

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 2008

1 district · 7 state decisions

5019651970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

CARROLL, Judge.-

¶1This is an appeal from a post final decree order. The appellant had sued for and obtained a decree for alimony unconnected, with divorce. In the opinion filed by this, court on this date, on appeal by the wife-from the final decree, we reversed a portion of the decree which divested the plaintiff wife of. stock which she owned jointly with her husband in two corporations. See Porterfield v. Porterfield, Fla.App.1965, 181 So.2d 16. The interlocutory order now-appealed was an injunction designed to-limit the control or participation of the-wife in the management of the corporations,, being based upon and consistent with the (superseded) final decree which awarded', the wife’s stock to the husband. This court having ruled, on the wife’s appeal from the-final decree, that she is entitled to retain-her jointly owned stock interest in said' corporations, the injunction order to which, this appeal is directed is without foundation and present purpose, and accordingly-is reversed.

¶2Reversed.

/181/so2d/19 · .json · Public domain