Hirsh v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 1968
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Keller v. Haas · Brown v. Benton Creosoting Co. · 134 So. 2d 395 - Keller v. Thompson · Eugene Dietzgen Co. v. Kokosky · Moorman v. Parkerson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"A reasonable prohibition against competition will be upheld, however, when as alleged by Plaintiffs, it is part of the consideration for the sale of a business and its goodwill; Moorman & Givens v. Parkerson, 131 La. 204 , 59 So. 122 ; Eugene Dietzgen Co. v. Kokosky, 113 La. 449 , 37 So. 24 , [ 66 L.R.A. 503 ]; Hickman v. Branan, La.App., 151 So. 113 ; 27 Tul.L.Rev. 364."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““If it can be said that plaintiff terminated the employment contract, it must-be conceded that it had a right reserved to do so, but the employment was not terminated until October 3, 1963.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hirsh v. Miller
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.