181 SO2D 346 - Baker v. Maytag

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 2002

5 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

PER CURIAM.

¶1The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this court, and the writ was issued. Argument has been heard and upon further consideration and review of the briefs and cited cases, we are unable to find sufficient conflict with the decisions of this court or of the other District Courts of Appeal to vest jurisdiction in this court as required by the Constitution, Article V, Section 4, F.S.A.

¶2Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of cer-tiorari is dismissed.

¶3It is so ordered.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, O’CONNELL and ERVIN, JJ., and JOHNSON, District Court Judge, concur.THORNAL, C. J., agrees to judgment dismissing petition.DREW, J., heard argument but did not participate in the decision.