Cassidy v. Cassidy’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 2006
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Offutt v. United States · Sacher v. United States · State Ex Rel. Giblin v. Sullivan · 141 So. 2d 615 - Neering v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It has been pointed out that it is better for the judge who finds himself wronged to set the hearing upon the citation before another judge... . (citations omitted). However, we know of no rule which requires this practice ... . (citations omitted)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“no indication in the record that the defendant fully appreciated the possible relation of his conduct to the administration of justice”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Forbes v. State“the statements may well be those of a person who was under great pressure and conflict and who was not fully cognizant of their impact”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Forbes v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.