181 So. 3d 223 - State v. Noel’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Allison v. United States · Biros v. Bagley · Massie v. Sumner · 630 So. 2d 1278 - State v. Robertson · 474 So. 2d 919 - State v. Jones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When the defendant exposes the partiality of a juror, the juror may not be automatically excluded for cause. The state or the trial court may rehabilitate the juror by asking questions and obtaining answers demonstrating the juror's ability to decide the case impartially pursuant to law and evidence. Ultimately, the trial court has the power to determine whether or not a juror may be excused for cause.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Miller“The defendant may withdraw a plea of "not guilty" and enter a plea of "not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity," within ten days after arraignment. Thereafter, the court may, for good cause shown, allow such a change of plea at any time before the commencement of the trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he 'timeliness' of the motion should not have been a deciding factor, as this case was not going to trial until after [the constitutional question was resolved].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.