Ware v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
August 2021
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 471 So. 2d 485 - Faircloth v. State · 471 So. 2d 493 - Ex Parte Faircloth · 358 So. 2d 1040 - Bankston v. State · 730 So. 2d 652 - Ex Parte Woodall · Powe v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[W]e affirm Ware’s conviction and sentence as to the first-degree-rape charge. As to the first-degree-burglary and first-degree-robbery charges, we reverse the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals [affirming those convictions] and remand the case for that court to direct the trial court to vacate those convictions, to enter á judgment convicting Ware of the applicable lesser-included offense as to each of the robbery and burglary offenses, and to impose appropriate sentences.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Ware v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.