Shaw v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 249th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Mathews v. United States · Muniz v. State · McIntyre v. Ramirez · United States v. Maseratti · Williams v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[pjersons not licensed or certified in the healing arts.” Tex Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 74.152 (emphasis added to note change). Of course, this amendment is helpful to our analysis only to the extent it indicates legislative intent, since this amended provision is not at issue here. A law review article addressing the changes brought about by House Bill 4 took the position that this amendment”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dunlap v. Young
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.