Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 181 SW3D 541 - Hill v. Bartlette

Hill v. Bartlette’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 123rd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co. · Science Spectrum, Inc. v. Martinez · Casso v. Brand · Natividad v. Alexsis, Inc. · Star-Telegram, Inc. v. Doe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) a false representation or concealment of material fact; (2) the representation was made with knowledge or the means of knowledge of the true facts; (3) the representation was made to a party without knowledge or the means of knowledge of the true facts; (4) the representation was made with the intention that it would be acted on; and (5) the party to whom the representation was made relied on it to his or her prejudice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.