Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

181 S.W.3d 632

Gillette v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 2006

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2006-01-17

Decided 2006-01-17

¶1Order

PER CURIAM.

¶2Andy Gillette moved for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035. Gillette alleged that his plea counsel was ineffective for promising Gillette that if he took the State’s offer of a ten-year sentence, he would also be sentenced to long-term drug treatment, which did not occur. After an evidentiary hearing, the motion court denied Gillette’s motion. Gillette argues on *633appeal that the motion court’s findings and conclusions that plea counsel was not ineffective were clearly erroneous. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

/181/sw3d/632 · .json · Public domain