State v. Bobadilla’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Odom · State v. Melson · State v. Yeargan · State v. Crutcher · Talley v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]ecause the hour was not endorsed by the magistrate on the search warrant in this case, the warrant fails to explicitly show that it was issued first-then executed. Therefore, the search warrant fails to meet the requirements as set forth in Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(c).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) Issuance.-A warrant shall issue only on an affidavit or affidavits that are sworn before the magistrate and establish the grounds for issuing the warrant. (2) Content.-If the magistrate is satisfied that there is probable cause to believe that grounds for the application exist, the magistrate shall issue a warrant as follows: (A) The warrant shall, as the case may be, identify the property or place to be searched, or name or describe the person to be searched; the warrant also shall name or describe the property or person to be seized. (B) The search warrant shall command the law enforcement officer to search promptly the person or place named and to seize the specified property or person. (C) The search warrant shall be directed to and served by: (i) the sheriff or any deputy sheriff of the county where the warrant is issued; or (ii) any constable or any other law enforcement officer with authority in the county. (D) The magistrate shall endorse on the search warrant the hour, date, and name of the officer to whom the warrant was delivered for execution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the search warrant on its face did not meet the requirements of Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(c). Therefore, the warrant was invalid, the search was illegal, and the evidence obtained thereby inadmissible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.