Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 181 SW3D 855 - State v. Oakley

State v. Oakley’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2008
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Probate Court)

Relationships

Relies on Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. Stevens · Federal Sign v. Texas Southern University · Wichita Falls State Hospital v. Taylor · Joseph Beers v. The State of Arkansas · University of Texas Medical Branch v. York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person who receives compensation under this chapter may not bring any action involving the same subject matter, including an action involving the person’s arrest, conviction, or length of confinement, against any governmental unit or an employee of any governmental unit. 32”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.