Marks v. Shoup’s Empirical Analysis
181 U.S. 562 · 1901
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 1962
4 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Matthews v. Densmore · Philbrick v. O'Connor · Crawford v. Beard · Lyons v. Leahy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Other personal property shall be attached by leaving a certified copy of the writ, and a notice specifying the property attached, with the person having the possession of the same. * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Price v. Boot Shop““Personal property capable of manual delivery to the sheriff, and not in the possession of a third person, shall be attached by taking it into his custody.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Price v. Boot Shop
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.