Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 181 VA 718 - Reid v. Boward

Reid v. Boward’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
June 1975
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 1975

5 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

501943195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hubbard v. Murray · Kinsey v. Brugh · Harris v. Howerton · Bristow v. Brauer · Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Richmond Cedar Works

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The violation of a statute, although negligence per se, will not support a recovery for damages unless such violation proximately causes or contributes to the injury complained of.” Reid v. Boward, 1943, 181 Va. 718 , 723, 26 S.E.2d 27 , 29. 14”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.