Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 181 Vt. 154 - Montgomery v. Devoid

Montgomery v. Devoid’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Diduck v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc. · Robertson v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc. · Keys v. Chrysler Credit Corp. · Gerosa v. Savasta & Co. · Edmond v. Consumer Protection Division

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person is subject to liability for harm resulting to a third person from the tortious conduct of another if the person: (1) commits a tortious act as part of a common design with the other; (2) gives substantial assistance to the other knowing that the other’s conduct is a breach of duty; or (3) gives substantial assistance to the other to accomplish a tortious result while also acting in a manner that is a breach of duty to the third person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “an intentional exercise of dominion or control over a chattel which so seriously interferes with the right of another to control it that the actor may justly be required to pay the other the full value of the chattel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Although conversion did not traditionally lie for taking paper money, the plaintiff had an action of some kind and today the action may well be called one for conversion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.