State v. Tester’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2011
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · United States v. Agurs · United States v. LeRoy · United States v. Zackson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To warrant a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence . . . defendant needed to establish all of the following: (1) the new evidence would probably change the result upon retrial; (2) the new evidence was discovered after trial; (3) the evidence could not have been discovered sooner through due diligence; (4) the evidence was material; and (5) the evidence was not merely cumulative or impeaching.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Coyle v. Hofmann“clearly could have discovered the videotape through the exercise of due diligence,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rooney
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.