Scott v. Ross’s Empirical Analysis
1923
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 2010
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 4 E.H. Smith 190 - Kiernan v. Dutchess County Mutual Insurance · Brook v. Chappell · Washburn v. Union Central Life Insurance · Pabst Brewing Co. v. City of Milwaukee · Ruth v. Oberbrunner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“After the judgment of which appellants had notice they had the right to apply to the county court to have it corrected if they chose to do so. The rule is very liberal in respect to such proceedings. Sec. 4046, Stats. [now sec. 324.21]; Estate of Leavens, 65 Wis. 440 , 27 N. W. 324 ; In re Fisher, 15 Wis. 511 ; Brook v. Chappell, 34 Wis. 405 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Estate of Hatzl
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.