Mitchell v. Raymond’s Empirical Analysis
1923
Citation profile
1 district · 30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently April 1980 · most notably 95 Wis. 2d 173 - Mulder v. Acme-Cleveland Corp. (1980), Boggs v. Plybon (1931)
1 district · 30 state decisions — followed in 17 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Massaletti v. Fitzroy · Lambert v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co. · Flynn v. Lewis · Bell v. Siegel · Dickerson v. Connecticut Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We must also decline to recognize any such possible distinction as is spoken of in several decisions between the guest who asks for a favor and the guest who is first invited by the host.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Renich v. Klein
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.