Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 181 WIS 68 - Levander v. Johnson

Levander v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1923

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
4
states following
November 1987
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 1987

6 state decisions

201923193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Crowe v. Trickey · Braniff v. Baier · Rowan & Co. v. Hull · Birdsall v. Fraenzel · Schoenmann v. Whitt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There is no actual showing in this case by plaintiffs of anything having actually been done by them in reliance upon the contract and for the purpose of performance thereunder prior to the time of the notice of revocation. There was nothing, therefore, in the shape of performance on their part sufficient to have made the contract absolute between the parties at the time of the revocation, under the views expressed in Schoenmann v. Whitt, 136 Wis. 332, 334 , 117 N. W. 851 .” (Citing other cases.) 6”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.