Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 181 Wis. 2d 118 - State v. Borst

181 Wis. 2d 118 - State v. Borst’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 2019

9 state decisions

40199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3663

Relies on 102 Wis. 2d 539 - Eberhardy v. Circuit Court for Wood County · 166 Wis. 2d 442 - Waushara County v. Graf · 154 Wis. 2d 612 - In Interest of CAK · 121 Wis. 2d 670 - State v. Martin · 141 Wis. 2d 642 - State v. Baudhuin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Restitution is governed by Wis. Stat. § 973.20 , which requires courts to order full or partial restitution 'under this section' to any victim of a crime 'unless the court finds substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When imposing sentence or ordering probation for any crime, the court, in addition to any other penalty authorized by law, shall order the defendant to make full or partial restitution. . .unless the court finds substantial reasons not to do so and states the reason on the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “unless it finds substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.