181 Wis. 2d 470 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2001
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Huddleston v. United States · Wright v. Wright · 115 Wis. 2d 334 - State v. Pharr · 84 Wis. 2d 145 - McClelland v. State · 167 Wis. 2d 247 - State v. Whitaker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“and that the evidence presented was sufficient to do so. See id. at 660 . However, the application of the Anderson standard was clarified in State v. Johnson, 181 Wis. 2d 470 , 510 N.W.2d 811 (Ct. App. 1993). There, we observed that Anderson does not require the admission of an out-of-court statement that tends to expose the declarant to criminal liability when the corroboration is merely debatable. Johnson, 181 Wis. 2d at 483 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Rather, Anderson recognized that a statement against penal interest. . . must be excluded if the trial court, in the exercise of its discretion, con- eludes that, consistent with Rule 901.04(2), no reasonable jury could find that the statement could be true.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.