181 Wis. 2d 978 - State v. Evans’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably 198 Wis. 2d 756 - State v. Schmaling (1995), 208 Wis. 2d 492 - State v. Beiersdorf (1997)
32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3583
Relies on United States v. Daddato · 143 Wis. 2d 500 - State v. Connelly · 163 Wis. 2d 800 - State v. Peterson · Montana v. Fertterer · State v. Hopkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The State has argued persuasively that the public's money received by a defendant in connection with an undercover drug purchase that results in his or her conviction should be subject to return when the defendant is sentenced. The legislature has not so provided, however, and it is not within our province to write or rewrite state statutes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to the crime laboratory presumably to cover the costs of the investigation into Evans's drug crimes, the issue on appeal was solely and specifically whether the trial court had authority, under § 973.20(1), STATS., to order the defendant to reimburse the Metro Narcotics Unit for $120 in”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(1) Except as provided in s. 93.20, the costs taxable against the defendant shall consist of the following items and no others: (c) Fees and disbursements allowed by the court to expert witnesses. Section 814.04(2) shall not apply in criminal cases.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.