Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 182 Ariz. 118 - Montgomery v. Sheldon

Montgomery v. Sheldon’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
September 2023
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently September 2023 · most notably State v. Roscoe (1996), State v. Smith (1996)

33 state decisions

1601995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Bible · Montgomery v. Sheldon · State v. Gortarez · Wilson v. Ellis · State v. Whipple

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[c]onsistent with Ariz. Const. art. 2, § 24 and A.R.S. § 13-4035, the court of appeals must examine the record before it for fundamental error....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “MOELLER, V.C.J., and CORCORAN and ZLAKET, JJ., concur. MARTONE, Justice, concurring in the judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[] § 13-4035 requires the court of appeals to search for fundamental error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.