State v. Love’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2 district · 27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently August 2014 · most notably State v. Zaragoza (2009), State v. Cyr (2009)
2 district · 27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Webb · Atkinson v. State · State v. Zavala · 495 So. 2d 1144 - Ex Parte City of Gadsden · State v. SUPER. CT., GREENLEE COUNTY
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A. It is unlawful for any person to drive or be in actual physical control of any vehicle within this state under any of the following circumstances: 1. While under the influence of intoxicating liquor, [or] any drug ... if the person is impaired to the slightest degree.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“1. Whether the vehicle was running; 2. Whether the ignition was on; 3. Where the ignition key was located; 4. Where and in what position the driver was found in the vehicle; 5. Whether the person was awake or asleep; 6. Whether the vehicle’s headlights were on; 7. Where the vehicle was stopped; 8. Whether the driver had voluntarily pulled off the road; 9. Time of day; 10. Weather conditions; 11. Whether the heater or air conditioner was on; 12. Whether the windows were up or down; 13. Any explanation of the circumstances shown by the evidence. This list is not meant to be all-inclusive. It is up to you to examine all the available evidence and weigh its credibility in determining whether the defendant actually posed a threat to the public by the exercise of present or imminent control of the vehicle while impaired.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Zaragoza“It is unlawful for a person to drive or be in actual physical control of a vehicle in this state under any of the following circumstances: 1. While under the influence of intoxicating liquor, any drug, a vapor releasing substance containing a toxic substance or any combination of liquor, drugs or vapor releasing substances if the person is impaired to the slightest degree. 2. If the person has an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more within two hours of driving or being in actual physical control of the vehicle and the alcohol concentration results from alcohol consumed either before or while driving or being in actual physical control of the vehicle.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Zaragoza
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.