State v. Aillon’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 52 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently January 2017 · most notably State v. Curcio (1983), State v. Ellis (1985)
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 52 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Benton v. Maryland · Green v. United States · United States v. Jorn · Arizona v. Washington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any barrier to reprosecution is removed. . . . [R]eprosecution . . . is barred only when prosecutorial or judicial overreaching is designed to provoke the defendant into asking for a mistrial, thereby avoiding an acquittal or affording the state another, perhaps more favorable, opportunity to convict, or the prosecutorial or judicial error was otherwise motivated by bad faith or attempted in order to harass or prejudice the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“However, as Perez and its progeny, e.g., United States v. Dinitz , [ 424 U.S. 600 ,] 608[, 96 S.Ct. 1075 , 47 L.Ed.2d 267 (1976)], and United States v. Jorn , supra, [ 400 U.S.] 484 , make clear, when a defendant consents to a declaration of a mistrial, no finding of manifest necessity for the declaration need be made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“While we doubt the correctness of the case's reasoning, it is distinguishable from the one at hand on the basis of numbers, if nothing else.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.