Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

182 Conn. 419

State v. Washington

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 1, 1980

Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 1980-07-01

Relies on Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority · Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Ass'n · N. P. Severin Co. v. Young

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1980-07-01

How this case has been cited

Cited by 116 later decisions — most recently June 2014 · most notably State v. Golding (1989), State v. Newsome (1996)

2 federal appellate · 114 state decisions

4301980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Bogdanski, J.

¶1(concurring). On July 1, 1980, this court ordered a new trial for the defendant on the basis of a statutory violation. This court has on numerous occasions espoused the principle that *430the court will not pass upon a constitutional question if there is present some other ground upon which the case may be decided. State v. Gold, 180 Conn. 619, 639-40, 430 A.2d 501, cert. denied, 449 U.S. 920, 101 S. Ct. 320, 66 L. Ed. 2d 148 (1980); Negron v. Warden, 180 Conn. 153, 166-67, 429 A.2d 841 (1980). This is a fundamental principle of constitutional law. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 297 U.S. 288, 347, 56 S. Ct. 466, 80 L. Ed. 688 (1936) (Brandeis, J., concurring), reh. denied, 297 U.S. 728, 56 S. Ct. 588, 80 L. Ed. 1011 (1936).

¶2Moreover, no reason for changing the law has been indicated. While this court should not hesitate to overrule outmoded principles, the doctrine of stare decisis requires that we rule according to precedent until there is good reason to change the law. Herald Publishing Co. v. Bill, 142 Conn. 53, 62, 111 A.2d 4 (1955).

/182/conn/419 · .json · Public domain