Gilman v. Pedersen’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
40 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently December 2010 · most notably Kakalik v. Bernardo (1981), Neiman v. Yale University (2004)
40 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of Manchester · Martin v. Kavanewsky · Sagamore Corporation v. Willcutt · Stelco Industries, Inc. v. Cohen · Wonalancet Co. v. Banfield
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“substantial conformity with the requirements of the contract.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“"Repudiation is actionable only in the absence of breach or repudiation by the other contracting party; only a party himself not in default has the right to claim that the other party's manifestation of an intention not to perform constitutes a breach of the contract."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Repudiation can occur either by a statement that the promisor will not perform or by a voluntary, affirmative act that indicates inability or apparent inability, substantially to perform.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.