182 Conn. App. 373 - State v. Crosby’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Mauro · Austin Products Co. v. Workers' Compensation Insurers Rating Association of Minnesota · United Transportation Union v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority · Paul v. A. Levy & J. Zentner Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“as long as [the instructions] are correct in law, adapted to the issues and sufficient for the guidance of the jury ... we will not view the instructions as improper”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The role of due process protections with respect to preaccusation delay has been characterized as a limited one.... [T]he Due Process Clause does not permit courts to abort criminal prosecutions simply because they disagree with a prosecutor's judgment as to when to seek an indictment.... This court need only determine whether the action complained of ... violates those fundamental conceptions of justice which lie at the base of our civil and political institutions ... and which define the community's sense of fair play and decency .... The due process clause has not replaced the applicable statute of limitations ... [as] ... the primary guarantee against bringing overly stale criminal charges.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Significantly, our Supreme Court in [ State v. Guilbert , 306 Conn. 218 , 49 A.3d 705 (2012) ] emphasized that a trial court retains the discretion to decide whether, under the specific facts and circumstances presented, focused and informative jury instructions on eyewitness testimony are warranted.... In reviewing the discretionary determinations of a trial court, every reasonable presumption should be given in favor of the correctness of the court's ruling.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.