In re Forse’s Empirical Analysis
182 F. 212 · 1910
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
December 1910
most recently cited
1 district ·
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This contract and agreement made and entered into this 8th day of October, 1908, by and between Leon Y. Jones of the town of Guilford, county of Chenango and state of New York, party of the first part, and Amos L. Forse .and George Roseboom, both of the city of Binghamton, Broome county, New York, parties of the second part, in the manner following: The said party of the first part hereby agrees to sell and the said parties of the second part hereby agree to buy and purchase of the said party of the first part his stock of goods, store furnishings and fixtures formerly belonging to W. H. Neff & Son in the town of Guilford, Chenango county, New York, and they hereby agree to pay for said stock of goods the cost price, and they agree to pay for all fixtures such a sum as shall be agreed upon between the .parties hereto, and if the parties hereto are unable to agree upon the price of said fixtures then the party of the first part shall pick a disinterested party and the parties of the second part shall pick a disinterested party to determine the value and price of such fixtures, and when the cost price of said stock of goods and the value of said fixtures is agreed upon then the said parties of the second part hereby agree to pay the total amount of the cost price of said stock and the agreed price of such fixtures to the said party of the first part as follows: $100.00 or more thereof off the 26th day of December, 1908, and $1O0.OO or more monthly thereafter until the said pur”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Forse
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.