Dalton v. Hazelet’s Empirical Analysis
182 F. 561 · 1910
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently August 2019
6 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Shively v. Bowlby · Illinois Central Railroad v. Illinois · Bronson v. Schulten · Phillips v. Negley · Duncan v. Missouri
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The last order was therefore a separate and distinct document. The so-called bill of exceptions and the signature of the judge to the order did not constitute a signature to the bill of exceptions.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.