In re Herr’s Empirical Analysis
182 F. 716 · 1910
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 11 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 1947
3 federal appellate · 11 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Daniel Holden v. J a Stratton · Hiscock v. Mertens · In re White · In re Diack · In re Coleman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““While the wife, as it stands, is the contingent beneficiary, the policy is under the complete control of the bankrupt, and he may change the situation at any moment, and realize upon it, without regard to her, either giving it up and getting the surrender value, or continuing it with a newly designated beneficiary, just as he may choose.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Young
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.