Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 182 F.2d 198 - In re Rose

In re Rose’s Empirical Analysis

182 F.2d 198 · 1950

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
June 1953
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 33

Relies on In re Vickers · In re McCabe · In re Langdon · In re Wharton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “shall particularly point out and distinctly claim the part, improvement, or combination which he claims as his invention or discovery.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.