Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

182 F.2d 258

Docket No. 12466.

Duncan v. Cranor

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

May 8, 1950. Rehearing Denied May 23, 1950.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1950-05-08

2 counsel of record

Relies on Cooper v. Cranor

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1950-05-08

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently September 1985

15 federal appellate ·

701950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, Southern Division; Sam M. Driver, Judge.

Maurice Duncan, in pro. per.

Smith Troy, Atty. Gen., Lawrence K. McDonell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before MATHEWS, HEALY and BONE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This appeal is from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington denying an application of appellant, Maurice Duncan, a prisoner in custody pursuant to a judgment of a court of the State of Washington, for a writ of habeas corpus. The case does not differ materially from Cooper v. Cranor, 9 Cir., 182 F.2d 256. For the reasons there stated, the order here appealed from is affirmed.

/182/f2d/258 · .json · Public domain