Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 182 F.2d 368 - International Workers Order, Inc. v. McGrath

International Workers Order, Inc. v. McGrath’s Empirical Analysis

182 F.2d 368 · 1950

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
May 1974
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1974

5 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

110195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad · Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. United States · Perkins v. Lukens Steel Co. · Allen Calculators, Inc. v. National Cash Register Co. · La Crosse Telephone Corporation v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local B953 Af of L

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “maximum protection must be afforded the United States against infiltration of disloyal persons into the ranks of its employees, and equal protection from unfounded accusations of disloyalty must be afforded the loyal employees of the Government: . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a. The Loyalty Review Board shall disseminate such information to all departments and agencies.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.