Mosher v. Tate’s Empirical Analysis
182 F.2d 475 · 1950
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently March 2012 · most notably Treasure Salvors, Inc. v. Unidentified Wrecked & Abandoned Sailing Vessel (1978), Central Hudson Gas Electric Corporation v. Empresa Naviera Santa Sa (1995)
17 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Petterson Lighterage & Towing Corp. v. New York Central R. · The Monte A. · The Minnetonka · 76 F. Supp. 27 - The Fairisle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e think that under all of the circumstances of this case and in order to achieve substantial justice the trial court has power to enter a personal decree against appellees without any additional service of process or supplemental libel.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] court of admiralty ... should not be hampered in its efforts to reach ... substantial justice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.