Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 182 F.3d 1096 - Big Bear Lodging Ass'n v. Snow Summit, Inc.

Big Bear Lodging Ass'n v. Snow Summit, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

182 F.3d 1096 · 1999

Citation profile

76
cited by 76 later decisions
1
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably Wyatt v. Terhune (2003), John Bollard v. The California Province of the Society of Jesus (1999)

26 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

4801999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Conley v. Gibson · Hishon v. King & Spalding · Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]his court has imposed the ultimate sanction of dismissal only in egregious cases of noncompliance”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Issues appealed but not briefed are deemed abandoned.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “All allegations of material fact are taken as true and construed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.” Id. (quoting Cahill v. Liberty Mut. Ins., 80 F.3d 336 , 337-38 (9th Cir. 1996)). However, the party must allege”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.