United States v. Register’s Empirical Analysis
182 F.3d 820 · 1999
Citation profile
38 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 93 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably State v. Gross (2002), United States v. Kaley (2009)
38 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 3162 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 853 (§ 413 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 46
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Doggett v. United States · Wheat v. United States · United States v. Lane
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“only circuit holding that, although pre-trial restraint of assets needed to retain counsel implicates the Due Process Clause, the trial itself satisfies this requirement”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he court also enjoys substantial discretion in choosing the investigative procedure to be used in checking for juror misconduct.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“); United States v. Moya-Gomez, 860 F.2d 706 , 725-30 (7th Cir. 1988); United States v. Lewis, 759 F.2d 1316 , 1324-25 (8th Cir. 1985); United States v. Crozier, 777 F.2d 1376 , 1383-84 (9th Cir. 1985); United States v. Long, 654 F.2d 911 , 915-16 (3d Cir. 1981). But see United States v. Register, 182 F.3d 820 , 835 (11th Cir. 1999) (recognizing that the Eleventh Circuit is the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.