In Re R Greg Bailey’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably No. 02-15113 (2004), 46 Fed. Cl. 554 - CW Government Travel, Inc. v. United States (2000)
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc. · Silkwood v. Corporation · Ratzlaf et Ux United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Courts are endowed with inherent powers which are necessary to the conduct of their business, including the power to sanction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. No. 02-15113 · No. 02-15113“); Yagman v. Republic Ins., 987 F.2d 622 , 628 (9th Cir.1993) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. No. 02-15113 · No. 02-15113“the constitutionality of either the contents or applications of the laws employed by the Veterans Administration’s (“VA’s”) officials from the personnel in the regional office (N.Y.RO), to the personnel in the Board of Veterans Appeals (BVA), and up to and including the members of the court of appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) and as same laws were employed by said officials to literally commit criminal offenses in the adjudication and appeals of Movant’s Claim for a disability rating due to service-connected mental disease or defect, to include Posh-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.