Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 182 Ill. 2d 193 - People v. Manning

182 Ill. 2d 193 - People v. Manning’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

191
cited by 191 later decisions
4
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 171 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 191 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably 209 Ill. 2d 194 - People v. Evans (2004), 204 Ill. 2d 159 - People v. Donoho (2003)

9 federal appellate · 171 state decisions

7901998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Colorado v. Connelly · Miller v. Fenton · Illinois v. Perkins · 145 Ill. 2d 353 - People v. Illgen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 191 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The admission of a recording that is partially inaudible, or that reproduces only part of a statement or conversation, is a matter within the trial court's discretion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““were meant to preserve the fifth[-] amendment privilege against self-incrimination during incommunicado interrogation of individuals in a police-dominated atmosphere. Courts view that atmosphere as generating inherently compelling pressures that work to undermine the individual’s will to resist and to compel the person to speak where the person would not otherwise do so freely.” People v. Manning, 182 Ill. 2d 193, 206 , 695 N.E.2d 423, 429 (1998).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Miranda is not implicated in conversations between suspects and undercover agents. The essential ingredients of a police-dominated atmosphere and compulsion are not present when a prisoner speaks freely to an undercover agent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.