Hatterman v. Tieman

Decided October 9, 1913

Appellate Court of Illinois · decided 1913-10-09

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Appeal and error, § 886*—what abstract of record must include. Ruling on objections and exceptions to a master’s report cannot be considered when such objections and exceptions are not included in the abstract of record. 2. Appeal and ebbob, § 789*—when hill of exceptions unnecessary. Bill of exceptions in a chancery cause is neither necessary nor proper, unless it he to preserve oral evidence introduced upon the hearing under the statute allowing it to be done. 3. Appeal and ebbob, § 855*—when certificate of evidence not necessary. Evidence need not be preserved by a certificate of the chancellor when there is a report of the master in chancery. The master’s report is a part of the record.

Affirmed · Decided 1913-10-09

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Appeal and ebbob, § 789*—when hill of exceptions unnecessary. Bill of exceptions in a chancery cause is neither necessary nor proper, unless it he to preserve oral evidence introduced upon the hearing under the statute allowing it to be done.3. Appeal and ebbob, § 855*—when certificate of evidence not necessary. Evidence need not be preserved by a certificate of the chancellor when there is a report of the master in chancery. The master’s report is a part of the record.