Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 182 ILLAPP 350 - Cutler v. Pardridge

Cutler v. Pardridge’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 1951
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 1951

5 state decisions

3019131920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Board of Trade v. Christie Grain & Stock Co. · Clews v. Jamieson · Bibb v. Allen · Miller v. Ammon · The President Directors and Company of the Bank of the United States v. William Owens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Plaintiff’s case consisted of proof of the individual transactions engaged in at defendant’s request. Defendant did not deny that they took place, or that the plaintiff was his authorized agent. He relied upon affirmative defenses, and the burden of proving them unquestionably rested upon him. Pelouze v. Slaughter, 241 Ill. 215 ; Richelieu, Hotel Co. v. Military Encampment Co., 140 Ill. 248 ; Cothran v. Ellis, 125 Ill. 496 ; Clews v. Jamieson, 182 U. S. 461 . The case, therefore, as tried and submitted to the jury, presented no contention as to plaintiff’s case, whether the transactions he relied on took place and were authorized, but simply whether defendant had established his affirmative defenses, or either of them, that such transactions were invalid and closed out in violation of a contract for credit.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.