182 Ill. App. 3d 1075 - People v. Heim’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
March 2003
most recently cited
21 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 82 Ill. 2d 268 - People v. Cox · Wells v. Simonds Abrasive Co. · People Ex Rel. Wallace v. Labrenz · 102 Ill. 2d 201 - People v. Taylor · 82 Ill. 2d 234 - People v. Young
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The State may appeal any order permitting release by personal recognizance.” (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 38, par. 110 — 2.) “The State may appeal any order granting bail or setting a given amount for bail.” (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 38, par. 110— 5(e).) “The State may appeal any order where the court has increased or reduced the amount of bail or altered the conditions of the bail bond or granted bail where it has previously been revoked.” (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 38, par. 110 — 6(g).) 1”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“`encroach upon the exclusive power of the supreme court to regulate matters of appellate practice and procedure.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.