182 Ind. App. 62 - Spence v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on California v. Green · Mattox v. United States · The Hicks Co., Inc., Etc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Thomas Wheeler v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Thomas Wheeler v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue · Phillips v. Wyrick · Simpson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the witness was under oath at the prior proceeding, whether the defendant was represented by counsel at the prior proceeding, whether the prior proceeding was conducted before a judicial tribunal equipped to provide a judicial record, and whether the defendant had every opportunity to cross-examine the witness as to his statement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mendez v. State“Absolute identity is not required, only sufficient identity to insure that crosg-exami-nation in the former case was directed to the issues presently relevant and that the former parties were the same in motive and interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnston v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.