182 Ind. App. 71 - Buck v. P. J. T.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Service delivered by United States mail, postage prepaid, as certified mail with a return receipt satisfies the method requirement of due process. No contention is made that the information contained was inadequate or that inadequate time to respond was provided. Since actual delivery to the party is not jurisdictionally nee-essary, Buck's argument that the court failed to acquire personal jurisdiction fails.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Precision Erecting, Inc. v. Wokurka · Storm Damage Specialists of America d/b/a America's SDS Construction, Inc. v. Melissa A. Johnson and Michael B. Johnson

2. “[W]e must bear in mind ... [t]here is a difference between a form of service that is not reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to be heard and a form that, while reasonably calculated to give actual notice, fails to do so in a specific case. In the former, personal jurisdiction is not acquired because the proceeding fails to accord due process. In the latter, personal jurisdiction is present.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Washington v. Allison

3. “[when the warrant lacks legal purpose, its existence serves only as an impermissible barrier to due process.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. Best v. State