Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 182 Kan. 180 - State v. Fields

State v. Fields’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
March 1972
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 1972

19 state decisions

130195719601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Fouts · State v. Campbell · State v. Smith · State v. Stewart · State v. Spohr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘It has long been the rule that such oral admissions against interest in criminal prosecutions are properly admitted as evidence if fully made, with out inducement or duress, or brought about by some other improper means, and such admissions do not contravene Section 10 of the Bill of Rights against self-incrimination.’ ” (l. c. 185.)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Under the provisions of G. S. 1949, 62-401 the venue of an offense is jurisdictional and it must be proved to establish the jurisdiction of the court (Hagan v. The State, 4 Kan. 75 [2nd Ed.].) but by the great weight of authority it is not necessary to prove this fact by specific question and answer. It may be established by other competent evidence that the offense was committed in the jurisdiction of the court. . . .””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.