Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 182 Kan. 419 - Uhock v. Hand

Uhock v. Hand’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
June 1977
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miller v. Hudspeth · James v. Amrine · Hartman v. Edmondson · Foster v. Hudspeth · Wilson v. Hand

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““And finally, petitioner’s contention that no complaint or warrant was served at the time of his arrest, even if true, is of no avail to him in view of his plea of guilty which had the effect of waiving any and all irregularities prior to the entry of such plea.” (p. 885.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.