182 Md. App. 588 - Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Dillon v. State · Menish v. Polinger Company · Department of Natural Resources v. France · 59 Md. App. 584 - Blum v. Blum · William F. Klingensmith, Inc. v. David H. Snell Landscape Contractor, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: Article — Courts and Judicial Proceedings 1-j.OS. (b) A case before the Court of Special Appeals shall be heard [and decided] by a panel of not less than three judges. The panels shall be constituted, sit at the times, and hear the cases as directed by the Chief Judge from time to time. A quorum of a panel consists of one less than the number of judges designated to sit on the panel[, but never less than three judges]. The concurrence of a majority of a panel is necessary for the decision of a case. SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall apply to all cases in the Court of Special Appeals in which the mandate has not been issued as of the effective date of this Act. SECTION 3. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act is hereby declared to be an emergency measure and necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health and safety and having been passed by a yes and nay vote supported by three-fifths of all the members elected to each of the two Houses of the General Assembly, the same shall take effect from the date of its passage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jackson v. State“Bloom, J. participated in the hearing of the case and in the conference in regard to its decision, but died prior to adoption of the opinion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Jackson v. State“to all cases in the Court of Special Appeals in which the mandate has not been issued as of the effective date of this Act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Malutin v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.