Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 182 MICH 281 - Patterson v. Kasper

Patterson v. Kasper’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
4
states following
December 1940
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 1940

9 state decisions

301914192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rice v. Boyer · Charles Towne & Co. v. Wiley · Elwell v. Martin · Howe v. Clancey · Shaw v. Coffin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule is general that infants are liable for their torts in the same manner as adults. 22 Cyc. p. 618. But it is argued by defendants that this is a ‘matter arising ex contractu, and, even though it be infected with fraud, it cannot be changed into a tort in order to charge the infant by a change of remedy. ’ In a case like the present one it is said a safe test to apply is: ‘ Can the infant be held liable without directly or indirectly enforcing his promise?’ Rice v. Boyer, 108 Ind. 472 ( 9 N. E. 420 , 58 Am. Rep. 53 ). The plaintiff is not suing on the contract, nor is he relying thereon as he would have done had he affirmed the contract and brought an action for damages based upon the fraud of the defendants. He has, on the other hand, rescinded the contract, and he is now engaged in an effort to reclaim his money which found its way into defendant Kasper’s hands through the false and fraudulent representations of both defendants. Measured by the foregoing test, there would seem to be no sufficient reason why a recovery should be denied on this ground. * * * “ ‘It would be a reproach to the law, if a minor, when arrived to years of manhood, were to be allowed to escape from the payment of what is due, by the plea that he had stolen the money demanded of him when under age.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““It would be' a reproach to the law, if a minor, when arrived to years of manhood, were to be allowed to escape from the payment of what is due, by the plea that he had stolen the money demanded of him when under age.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.