Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

182 N.C. 767

108 S.E 633

Rollison v. . Alexander

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 12, 1921

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1921-10-12

Appeal by plaintiff from Devin, J., at Hay Term, 1921, of Pamlioo. Civil action to recover damages for an alleged negligent personal injury- Upon denial of liability and issues joined, tlie jury returned the following verdict: “1. Was plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: ‘Yes.’ “2. Did plaintiff by his own negligence contribute to his injury? Answer: ‘Yes.’ “3. What damage, if any, is plaintiff entitled to recover?

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1930

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1921-10-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Pee Cubiak.

¶1 An examination of the instant record leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried in substantial conformity to our decisions. Upon the controverted issues of fact, the jury have answered in favor of the defendant; and we have found no material error which would warrant us in disturbing the result.

¶2 The appeal raises no new question of law and we conclude that the trial below must be upheld.

¶3 No error.

/182/nc/767 · .json · Public domain