Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 182 N.C. App. 229 - Parker v. Glosson

182 N.C. App. 229 - Parker v. Glosson’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
1
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably 235 N.C. App. 77 - Lynn v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n (2014), Sandhill Amusements, Inc. v. Sheriff of Onslow County (2014)

49 state decisions

530200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 85 N.C. App. 669 - Harris v. NCNB National Bank of North Carolina · 138 N.C. App. 19 - Poor v. Hill · Peoples Security Life Insurance v. Hooks · 85 N.C. App. 338 - Dixon v. Stuart · 181 N.C. App. 511 - Burgin v. Owen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is no meeting of the minds, and, therefore, no contract, when in the contemplation of both parties . . . something remains to be done to establish contract relations.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The word de novo means fresh or anew; for a second time, and an appeal de novo is an appeal in which the appellate court uses the trial court's record but reviews the evidence and law without deference to the trial court's rulings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Poor v. Hill , 138 N.C. App. 19 , 26, 530 S.E.2d 838 , 843 (2000) (citation omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.